Installed and it looks like everything worked. Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > We don't have enough crap Android devices running 2.3. This is to also > help us buy devices for the device wall. The application can be found here: > > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.infil00p.phoneTest > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Simon MacDonald > <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Great idea Joe. I've got a Samsung Galaxy S running 2.3.5 so lemme >> know when it is up. >> >> But wait, isn't this a job for the PhoneGap Device Wall! >> >> http://phonegap.com/2012/03/29/phonegaps-new-device-wall/ >> >> Simon Mac Donald >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > OK, I published a test app on Google Play. I'll post the link once it >> > actually shows up. I want people to download and run it on their Android >> > 2.3 devices to see if we can find any that crash! If so, it'll be >> recorded >> > in the Error Report. That way we can finally know is this is a real bug >> or >> > something that only exists in the Emulator. >> > >> > I'll throw up the code on a repo somewhere as well. I made sure to use >> > zero permissions so that it's clear what the app is. (I bet it gets >> really >> > crap ratings!). >> > >> > Joe >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >> >> +1 science >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Bryce Curtis <curtis.br...@gmail.com >> >> >wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Yes, I meant providing your own classes that inherit from our >> >> >> CordovaChrome/WebView classes. >> >> >> >> >> >> From what I've observed recently, addJavascriptInterface is still >> >> broken in >> >> >> the emulator and on some (maybe small subset) of real phones. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I just tested it on the emulator. However, I don't think this is an >> >> issue >> >> > on real phones. When they wrote the switch, it was meant to allow >> >> Android >> >> > 2.3 to run on crap like the Quench. So far, I have never seen a phone >> >> that >> >> > has less than 256 MB of RAM produced, not even the HTC Wildfire (and >> that >> >> > phone sucked!). I honestly don't think that there's a single Android >> 2.3 >> >> > phone that has this bug. >> >> > >> >> > I think I'm going to release an application to prove this point. FOR >> >> > SCIENCE! >> >> > >> >> > Joe >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Bryce Curtis < >> curtis.br...@gmail.com >> >> >> > >wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > I really haven't had time to look at this in detail, but agree >> that >> >> >> > > anything related to the webview should be in CordovaWebView. As >> Fil >> >> >> > > mentioned, that includes the history, plugin manager, >> whitelisting, >> >> & >> >> >> > > authentication + callback server. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > I assume that overriding chrome/view clients so the user can >> specify >> >> >> > their >> >> >> > > own will still work. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > What do you mean overriding Chrome/View clients? You can use your >> own >> >> >> > classes if they inherit from the CordovaChrome class or >> CordovaWebView >> >> >> > class, but if you just cram a vanilla WebViewClient or >> >> WebChromeClient, >> >> >> > Cordova won't work at all. This has nothing to do with >> >> CordovaWebView, >> >> >> but >> >> >> > instead is a consequence of the prompt hack that acts as our >> current >> >> >> > bridge. If we want to make it so that we're not dependent on the >> >> >> > ChromeClient, we should probably bring back addJavascriptInterface >> and >> >> >> put >> >> >> > it in the view itself. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > BTW: Does the emulator still break when we do this on Android 2.3? >> I >> >> >> think >> >> >> > I'll have to look into that. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Joe >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > Sorry for late reply Joe! >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Looks great! As for outstanding issues as per your wiki article >> >> [1], >> >> >> I >> >> >> > > > would say move everything WebView related, as well as >> >> >> Cordova-specific >> >> >> > > > such as the plugin manager, into CordovaWebView.java. My >> thinking >> >> >> here >> >> >> > is >> >> >> > > > that, none of scaffolding necessary to enable device APIs in >> the >> >> web >> >> >> > view >> >> >> > > > should be a burden on the user - the CordovaWebView class >> should >> >> >> handle >> >> >> > > > all of that. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > It separates the cordova-y bits as something the WEbView needs >> to >> >> >> > manage >> >> >> > > > on its own, as well, and cleans up the final Activity-extending >> >> class >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > > > be simpler. Our end users should not have to worry about that >> >> stuff, >> >> >> > nor >> >> >> > > > do they need to see it in their own activities, or the >> generated >> >> >> > > > activities the baseline tooling within cordova-android >> provides. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > IMO: history, plugin manager, whitelisting, authentication, >> should >> >> >> all >> >> >> > be >> >> >> > > > handled by CordovaWebView. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/CordovaWebView >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > On 3/28/12 4:06 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >BUMP! Are we all on board with doing this? >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >Joe >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Joe Bowser < >> bows...@gmail.com> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >> Hey >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> I've been working on the CordovaWebView branch, and I think >> we >> >> >> need >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > > > >> discuss where to put the CallbackServer and PluginManager in >> >> the >> >> >> new >> >> >> > > > >> implementation. I'm OK with it being in the view, but I did >> >> have >> >> >> it >> >> >> > > in >> >> >> > > > >>the >> >> >> > > > >> Client before, and I'm wondering what people's thoughts are >> on >> >> >> that. >> >> >> > > > >>Also, >> >> >> > > > >> since these are core pieces of Cordova on Android, this may >> >> break >> >> >> > the >> >> >> > > > >> branch, which is fine, but it'd be good if more people >> looked >> >> at >> >> >> > this >> >> >> > > > >> branch, and discussed how this should work. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-android.git;a >> >> >> > > > >>=shortlog;h=refs/heads/CordovaWebView >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/CordovaWebView >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> Joe >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >>
