Is it too much to drop the new commit that changed the common js API, and
reapply it after we tag 1.6.1, and figure this one thing out for 1.7?

I also have some cordova-js commits to add to 1.6.1? Although nothing that
modifies any js outside of what is built for wp7. ( ie, all in my platform
specific plugins folder )




On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote:

> No - it's about a user's contribution being noted (it exists), I will
> move it out of the common code post-1.6.1 (I acknowledge my mistake in
> allowing it in the first place). Can we branch off 1.6.0 then
> cherry-pick Fil's latest fix for 1.6.1?
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote:
> > OK, so you're proposing that we leave the thing in the common JS, even
> > though it's not supposed to be there.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Will rebasing lose that commit? Then, no.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > So, can we just rebase the head, push this out and get this rolling?
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Correct, those iOS-specific parameters (like allow edit and those
> ones)
> >> >> existed prior to cordova-js, so yeah, we left them in there as we
> didn't
> >> >> want to remove without deprecation.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you can deal with the iOS issue without needing an API extension:
> >> then
> >> >> do that. If not, leave it in there, but docs need to updated too.
> >> >>
> >> >> Extending and changing the public API is a long and difficult process
> >> for
> >> >> us and will only get tougher with every platform we add support to.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 4/12/12 3:37 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Then we have to scrap the other three(?) iOS parameters ones that
> >> >> >already exist in common if you noticed. Don't know how we merge
> >> >> >(unmerge?) this one properly because taking those out will break
> >> >> >everyone that is using it, but a deprecation is the way to go as per
> >> >> >http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy . We can remove
> this
> >> >> >new commit and I'll find a way to get this in somehow.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> The problem is that this parameter doesn't belong in the common
> API.
> >> >> >>It'd
> >> >> >> be just ignored in Android, but the whole point of cordova-js is
> so
> >> that
> >> >> >> it's common.  It'd look pretty screwed up to add this to the docs,
> >> IMO.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Shazron <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> To fix two bugs for Camera.takePicture on iOS
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>> > so what's the point of this new parameter?
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > On 4/12/12 3:16 PM, "Shazron" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >>I did. Do we want to revert the cordova-js? I can branch 1.6.0
> and
> >> >> >>> >>cherry-pick your latest commit for 1.6.1
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>> I saw something in the iOS commit logs for this.
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> Shaz can you comment?
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>> On 4/12/12 2:59 PM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>Can we revert this, since this looks like it's intended for
> both
> >> >> >>> Android
> >> >> >>> >>>>and iOS, but I don't think it should be in 1.6.1.
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> I was actually just looking at that myself.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> Looks like it's an iOS-only param..  sigh. We gotta stop
> doing
> >> >> >>>that,
> >> >> >>> >>>>> especially if we don't update documentation.
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> On 4/12/12 2:49 PM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >Has anyone tested the cropToSize param for
> Camera.getPicture
> >> >> >>>yet?  I
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >didn't
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >notice that change until now.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]
> >
> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> JS tagged 1.6.1 - the build task in the JS should work
> >> >> >>>properly
> >> >> >>> >>>>>now.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> FYI if anyone has to modify the jake tasks in the future
> >> and
> >> >> >>>make
> >> >> >>> >>>>>them
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> async, make sure you add the 4th "async" parameter to
> the
> >> >> >>>task()
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>function
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> and set it to true, and call complete() when the task is
> >> done.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> See
> http://howtonode.org/intro-to-jake/async-jakefile.jsfor
> >> >> >>>an
> >> >> >>> >>>>> example.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> On 4/12/12 2:35 PM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >Ready to tag once cordova-js is tagged 1.6.1.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Anis KADRI <
> >> >> >>> [email protected]>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> I will tag my repository to 1.6.1 before end of day
> >> today
> >> >> >>>after
> >> >> >>> >>>>>some
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> thorough testing.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Shazron
> >> >> >>><[email protected]>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > I also created a 1.6.1 version tag as well in
> jira...
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Shazron
> >> >> >>><[email protected]>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > Alright guys since 1.6.0 was released, I'm going
> to
> >> >> >>> >>>>>"Release"
> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > 1.6.0 version in jira and move outstanding
> issues to
> >> >> >>>1.7.0
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>version
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > tag.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Filip Maj
> >> >> >>><[email protected]>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> The JS needs patching too. Since adding the
> commit
> >> ID
> >> >> >>>into
> >> >> >>> >>>>>the
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> packaging
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> in the jakefile, the default task isn't running
> >> >> >>>properly.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> You can manually run "jake build" and "jake
> test"
> >> but
> >> >> >>>not
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>"jake" on
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> its
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> own - gonna try to figure it out.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >> On 4/12/12 2:21 PM, "Shazron" <
> [email protected]>
> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>I'm good with tagging.  iOS has a few commits
> (one
> >> >> >>>commit
> >> >> >>> >>>>>in
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>cordova-js) as well. Aim for first thing
> tomorrow
> >> for
> >> >> >>>you
> >> >> >>> >>>>>to
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>repackage?
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Steven Gill
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >><[email protected]>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>wrote:
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> So a bug has been discovered in Cordova
> Android
> >> that
> >> >> >>> >>>>>requires
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>a
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>new
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > tag
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> release. You can check out the bug on the
> issue
> >> >> >>>tracker
> >> >> >>> >>>>>at
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-490?focusedCommentId=13252809#
> >> >> >>> >>>>>co
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>mment-13252809
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> It doesn't make sense to just repackage 1.6.0
> >> with
> >> >> >>>this
> >> >> >>> >>>>>bug
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>fixed as
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > we
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> will have no way to know if people are
> >> experiencing
> >> >> >>>this
> >> >> >>> >>>>>or
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>not.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Anis mentioned Bada also had some major issues
> >> >> >>>which he
> >> >> >>> >>>>>has
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>fixed
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> now
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>and
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> would like in a 1.6.1 release.
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> Thoughts?
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>>> -Steve
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>> >>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>>>
> >> >> >>> >>>
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to