I wish we could blame the carriers on this one but we can't. It is a
architecture issue with the Android OS itself. A lot of these ideas
made more sense when phones didn't have 8MP or 12MP cameras.

Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald


On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> argh +1
>
> should be a f/oss license that lets anyone modify code 'cept carriers
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We should probably add this to the Road Map, since it'll be a
>> substantial change.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Lorin Beer <lo...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> We own the camera on other platforms, and the functionality it offers is 
>>> pretty core to cordova usage. With the issues being reported, I think it 
>>> makes sense to bring it back in.
>>>
>>> - Lorin Beer
>>> On 2012-09-20, at 11:52 AM, Simon MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, I think it is time. I just responded to the guy who opened the
>>>> ticket on JIRA saying roughly the same thing. Also, I've been dealing
>>>> with some internal guys for the past 24 hours on camera problems so I
>>>> really think it would be less of a pain in the ass to bring the camera
>>>> internal to Cordova.
>>>>
>>>> I'm willing to take a first pass at it starting tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> Simon Mac Donald
>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hey
>>>>>
>>>>> We're getting a lot of people complaining about the camera crashing
>>>>> and the lifecycle issues.  Now, I've tried using the built in
>>>>> WebView.restoreState methods, and all I have gotten is a crashing
>>>>> application, so I'm thinking that it might be time that we owned the
>>>>> camera again.   I'm willing to do the work on this one, but I want to
>>>>> know if people think this is a good idea, or whether we should just
>>>>> shunt this to plugin developers again and hope they don't abandon it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Joe
>>>

Reply via email to