On 4 October 2012 12:20, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > Ross, what are the next steps for us to do for graduation > then---a vote?
Agreement by the community and your mentors that you are ready to graduate is needed. This can be a formal vote or can be a lazy consensus thing. You have two mentors (that I recall) saying you are ready and I see noone in the community objecting. I suggest that you assume lazy consensus within the community and get on with writing the charter. There is more information on how in http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution After that you ask the IPMC to vote to recommend you to graduate (I suggest you also use this as a last chance for the community to raise any objections since I'm suggesting missing a formal community vote - however if anyone has any objections they can do so now or during the charter drafting). Once the IPMC vote has concluded you submit the charter to the board and your (barring unexpected issues) done. Ross > > [1] http://hc.apache.org/charter.html > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> > wrote: >> The charter is an resolution that the Board votes on to create the >> TLP. For example: >> >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, >> related to a widgets-based, web-and-social mashup platform. >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Rave Project", >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> Foundation; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Rave Project be and hereby is >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> related to a widgets-based, web-and-social mashup platform; >> and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Rave" be >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> of the Apache Rave Project, and to have primary responsibility >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache Rave Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache Rave Project: >> >> * Ard Schrijvers <[email protected]> >> * Ate Douma <[email protected]> >> * Bas Zoetekouw <[email protected]> >> * Gerald Guo <[email protected]> >> * Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> >> * Jasha Joachimsthal <[email protected]> >> * Jesse Ciancetta <[email protected]> >> * Joost van Dijk <[email protected]> >> * Maarten Kremers <[email protected]> >> * Marlon Pierce <[email protected]> >> * Matt Franklin <[email protected]> >> * Niels van Dijk <[email protected]> >> * Okke Harsta <[email protected]> >> * Raminder Singh <[email protected]> >> * Ross Gardler <[email protected]> >> * Sander van der Waal <[email protected]> >> * Scott Wilson <[email protected]> >> * Sean Cooper <[email protected]> >> * Suresh Marru <[email protected]> >> * Tony Carlucci <[email protected]> >> * Unico Hommes <[email protected]> >> * Venkat Mahadevan <[email protected]> >> * Woonsan Ko <[email protected]> >> >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Franklin >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Rave, to >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Rave PMC be and hereby is >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> encourage open development and increased participation in the >> Apache Rave Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Rave Project be and hereby >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> Incubator Rave podling; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> Incubator Rave podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator >> Project are hereafter discharged. >> >> >> On 4 October 2012 11:50, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >>> We do not have a formal charter. I started something in the wiki [1] >>> drawing on some of the content from our proposal [2]. >>> >>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/Draft%20Charter >>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CallbackProposal >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I want to bump this thread up and get the graduation process started. We >>>> have released 2.1 as the first official release for Apache Cordova. >>>> >>>> Looking at the link Jukka posted ( >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#process) >>>> >>>> There are a few steps left till graduation: >>>> >>>> >>>> - a charter for your project >>>> - a positive community graduation >>>> VOTE<http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> >>>> - a positive IPMC recommendation >>>> VOTE<http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> >>>> - the acceptance of the >>>> resolution<http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution> >>>> by >>>> the Board >>>> >>>> I am not sure if we have a charter. Anyone have any details on this? >>>> >>>> We can start a vote thread, but I am wondering if we need to have the >>>> charter before we start it. >>>> >>>> -Steve >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Michael Brooks >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for 2.1 >>>>> >>>>> On 2012-09-07, at 12:14 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Well, want to point out if we ship 2.1 src (w/ official process and >>>>> > vote) the only additional step is another vote thread specifying >>>>> > whether we feel we're ready for graduating. (Which is why I'm thinking >>>>> > doing it sooner isn't a big deal.) >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> 2.1 is probably cutting it too close. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Around the time of 2.2 more realistic? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On 9/7/12 10:34 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> Hi guys, we are close to being ready to engage the graduation process >>>>> >>> and become a top level project. [1] Ross suggested we set a date and I >>>>> >>> agree. The next board report isn't due until November but that doesn't >>>>> >>> mean we cant' do thing sooner. My preference would be mid-september >>>>> >>> (after we ship 2.1) but maybe thats too soon. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler) >> Programme Leader (Open Development) >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
