I don't think we should change them for 2.2, and instead take some time for 2.3 to get them exactly how we want them, and consist across platforms.
I think keeping the existing scrips as-is for a deprecation period would cause more confusion than good. On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I think so. > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dully noted for the cli :) > > > > I'll have the cli reflect the command changes as well. > > > > Should there be any level of "deprecation" for this? I.e. Keep the old > > scripts around for 2.2 and then remove/rename as necessary completely for > > 2.3? > > > > On 10/16/12 11:39 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >ya 2.3 for sure --- I imagine this will bust up cordova-cli a little > > > > > >On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> Yes I like that much better. Should we target those changes for 2.2 or > > >>2.3 > > >> ? I am thinking 2.3. It will give us sometime to update the docs etcŠ > > >> > > >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> > ./cordova/BOOM is what you want. Why is it called like that and why > > >>>there > > >>> > is no such thing on iOS ? I don't knowŠ > > >>> > > >>> Heh. I did that as a joke for my 'Steve Jobs' demo. BOOM there's your > > >>>app. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > I am not a fan of "debug" to run on a device though. Can there be a > > >>> better > > >>> > word ? > > >>> > > >>> cordova/deploy? > > >>> > > > > >
