Ah yes. I was thinking about the progression wrong when I decided it was single progression (which made the nobody-out-at-the-top very strange so I should have figured it out.) Blame it on Sugar Hill euphoria (grin).
Thanks Linda Dale On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Linda Leslie <laleslie...@comcast.net>wrote: > The dance is a double progression. The first neighbor couple dance by in > the diagonal 1/2 hey; this is the only dancing that is done with them. The > second couple is then found in the completion of the hey across the set. One > hint to double progressions is not having a couple out at the top. And Seth > actually spells it: ContraQuad > Cheers! Linda Leslie > > > On Sep 2, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Dale Wilson wrote: > > Thanks, Jack. >> >> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Jack Mitchell <jamit...@mindspring.com >> >wrote: >> >> It's Contra Quad by Seth Tepfer. >>> >>> Jack >>> >>> >>> On 9/2/2010 2:23 PM, Dale Wilson wrote: >>> >>> This dance was called at Sugar Hill, but the caller didn't know the name >>>> or >>>> the author of the dance. >>>> >>>> It's a fun dance. Does anyone recognize it? >>>> >>>> Becket contra >>>> A1: Circle balance; Petronella turn; [no time for clapping] Nieghbor >>>> Swing. >>>> A2: Circle balance; Petronella turn; [no time for clapping] Partner >>>> Swing. >>>> B1: Right Diagonal Ladies pass right shoulders to start 1/2 Hey. Gents >>>> follow partner in Hey; >>>> Across with new neighbors, Ladies pass right shoulders to start 1/2 >>>> Hey Gents follow partner in Hey. >>>> B2: Partner Balance+Swing. >>>> >>>> Notes: >>>> Single CCW progression, but you're always in at the top. >>>> With an odd number of couples, the extra couple at the bottom waits >>>> becket >>>> on >>>> the side that lets them join the right diagonal hey. That's where they >>>> end >>>> up when they become the "out" couple, so they should NOT cross. >>>> >>>> Dale >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Callers mailing list >>>> call...@sharedweight.net >>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> Callers mailing list >>> call...@sharedweight.net >>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> I have been weaving for 35 years and no one has reinvented the wheel yet >> but >> we sure are having fun trying. >> -- Rugs By Joe >> _______________________________________________ >> Callers mailing list >> call...@sharedweight.net >> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers >> > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > call...@sharedweight.net > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers > -- I have been weaving for 35 years and no one has reinvented the wheel yet but we sure are having fun trying. -- Rugs By Joe
