Ron,

I think your "Loop Di Doo" figure is a lot like something that
occurs in some versions of the traditional (not modern western)
square dance "Forward Six" (a/k/a "Right Hand High, Left Hand Low"
or "Right Lady Over, Left Lady Under" ...).  See for example these
videos:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaDbKuJNqkM
        (watch the action as 2:45)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltQg0o_p0SU
        (watch at 1:12)

It's not exactly the same, since in the square dance figure it's
the left hand lady (already holding he partner's hand) who ducks
under the arch, while the right hand lady arches (rather than
diving) to get to her lonesome gent.

--Jim

On Jun 20, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Ron T Blechner wrote:

I wrote a dance that, when I finished it, I realized the A was the
same as 3-33,33:
http://contradances.tumblr.com/post/10510984149/ants-marching

It's gone over well, and has an easier finish. There's one move to
teach very carefully. (I uh ... sorta created a variation of a
left-hand-high-right-hand-low that goes into a swing ... called a Loop
Di Doo). It's been picked up by a few other callers, so, I know it's
not totally awful.

in dance,
Ron T Blechner


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Bree Kalb <[email protected]> wrote:
I agree with Michael. Especially in the case of a classic.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Barraclough <[email protected]>
Sent: Jun 20, 2013 5:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33

There are thousands of contras.  If one doesn't work, why not try
another one instead of altering that one?

Michael Barraclough



On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 13:16 -0700, Dave C wrote:

Instead of the Ladies Dosido 1.5 at the end to progress, just have the Ladies AL 1 1/2 in the center, with RH ready for the next neighbor. Some in the caller community have dubbed this version of the dance 3-33-34.

Dave Colestock
New Cumberland, PA


--- On Thu, 6/20/13, Kalia Kliban <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Kalia Kliban <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33
To: "Caller's discussion list" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 2:10 PM

I've had pretty good luck with it, possibly because I have the women ID the next neighbor early on. They know which face to look for. After that, they get a better feel for the area to aim for to find the new neighbor. A couple of seriously disoriented dancers can really play havoc with this dance though. It's brittle.

Kalia

On 6/20/2013 11:02 AM, Rickey Holt wrote:
3-33-33 lovers and callers - I have been calling this great dance recently and noticed that dancers of various experience levels in several venues have had trouble with the transition in the B2 from the Ladies Do-si- do 1 1/2 to the balance with the next neighbor that starts the dance. They have trouble finding that next neighbor, even after several times through, and with translating the momentum of crossing the set to that of up and down the line of the first part of the dance. I tried substituting an allemande right 1 1/2 for the do-si-do 1 1/2 of the original with little effect. What about a ladies allemande right about 1 1/2 to a next neighbor allemande left and then starting the dance again with a balance by the right with that neighbor? Other solutions? Have you or your dancers noticed the problem
that I have seen.  As always, thanks for your thoughts.

Rickey Holt

_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers


_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers


Bree Kalb, LCSW
301 W. Weaver St.
Carrboro, NC 27510
919-932-6262 ext 216
http://www.thewellnessalliance.com/BreeKalb.html

Regarding the Use of Email -- Please Note: Although I use a firewall and my computer is password protected, my emails are not encrypted. Therefore, I cannot guarantee confidentiality of email communication. If you choose to communicate confidential information with me via email, I will assume that you have made an informed decision and I will view it as your agreement to take the risk that email may be intercepted. Please be aware that email is
never an appropriate vehicle for emergency communication.  If you are
canceling an appointment less than 48 hours in advance, please
also leave me a voice mail message at my office.


_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Reply via email to