Maybe phrased squares can be a bit faster than contras because there is more resting (to catch your breath) in squares, waiting while the sides or heads do something... Becky
> On Sep 21, 2019, at 4:06 PM, callers-requ...@lists.sharedweight.net wrote: > > Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:36:37 -0400 > From: Rich Sbardella <richsbarde...@gmail.com > <mailto:richsbarde...@gmail.com>> > To: "Caller's discussion list" <call...@sharedweight.net > <mailto:call...@sharedweight.net>> > Subject: [Callers] Tempo for Squares > Message-ID: > <CAE4BujJAzmu=2xnbsdqtbpqgkhbyxakogacfaf0myrznxsz...@mail.gmail.com > <mailto:CAE4BujJAzmu=2xnbsdqtbpqgkhbyxakogacfaf0myrznxsz...@mail.gmail.com>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Folks, > I am curious. Tempo for contra is often below 120 bpm. I learned to call > squares at about 128 bpm. > Is this significant difference the norm, and if so why? > Rich Sbardella > Stafford Springs, CT
_______________________________________________ List Name: Callers mailing list List Address: Callers@lists.sharedweight.net Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/
