Hi Jos, Jaroslaw and Alexander, First, thank you very much for the fast and kind answers! I didn't knew about the possibility of the GPL to use the code in my own executable, thanks for spotting that! I guess this solves my question: I'm indeed not planning to redistribute the executable (at least for now).
As soon as I get a stable and clean implementation of the library, I'll come back to you for integration purpose. Still, as you pointed it, it probably makes sense to unify the licenses of the listed files. Attached you'll find the complete list of contributors who worked on them. If you want, I can try to contact individually the developers who worked on those files and propose them an alternative license for a packaging into a library. In this case, what should be the proposed license ? LGPLv2.1 or later? Thanks and best regards, Christophe Additional note: I didn't receive the responses to my original mail, since I was not part of the mailing list. I got lucky since I checked the online archive. Is this a wanted behaviour?
Ariya Hidayat <[email protected]> Brad Hards <[email protected]> Carlos Licea <[email protected]> Daniel A. Atkinson (Code already LGPL) David Faure <[email protected]> Inge Wallin <[email protected]> John Dailey <[email protected]> Jonathan Singer <[email protected]> Laurent Montel <[email protected]> Marijn Kruisselbrink <[email protected]> Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies). (Suresh Chande [email protected]) Norbert Andres <[email protected]> Phillip Mueller <[email protected]> Sascha Pfau <[email protected]> Simon Hausmann <[email protected]> Stefan Nikolaus <[email protected]> The KSpread Team <[email protected]> Thorsten Zachmann <[email protected]> Tomas Mecir <[email protected]> Torben Weis <[email protected]> Werner Trobin <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
