X-ECN Telecoms-MailScanner-Information: Contact ECN Telecoms
X-ECN Telecoms-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ECN Telecoms-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
        score=-103.966, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80,
        AWL 0.43, BAYES_00 -2.60, USER_IN_WHITELIST -100.00)
X-ECN Telecoms-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No

Sorry, I've just submitted a patch to fix that (revision 4609).

Bye
Damjan


On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 09:08 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:02 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  Modified: callweaver/trunk/apps/app_t38gateway.c
> >  ===================================================================
> >  --- callweaver/trunk/apps/app_t38gateway.c      2008-03-31 13:50:36 UTC 
> > (rev 4607)
> >  +++ callweaver/trunk/apps/app_t38gateway.c      2008-03-31 14:02:01 UTC 
> > (rev 4608)
> >  @@ -361,7 +361,12 @@
> >                      {
> >                          clean_frame(f);
> >                          break;
> >  +<<<<<<< .mine
> >                      }
> >  +
> >  +=======
> >  +                    }
> >  +>>>>>>> .r4440
> >                      samples = (f->samples <= MAX_BLOCK_SIZE)  ?  
> > f->samples  :  MAX_BLOCK_SIZE;
> >
> >                      if ((len = t38_gateway_tx(&t38_state, (int16_t *) 
> > &buf[CW_FRIENDLY_OFFSET], samples)))
> 
> Looks like some conflict markers got left in the commit.
> 
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Callweaver-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev

_______________________________________________
Callweaver-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev

Reply via email to