On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 12:29:41PM +0300, Konstantinos Arvanitis wrote: > I have applied it in the 1.2 branch and fixed the naming clashes so it > compiles. However I don't know if it's safe. Does the code in the 4673 > change set depend on any other functional changes in the trunk? Or > will it run fine from inside 1.2? > > If it does not depend on any other changes, should I open a bug and > attach the patch? And what should the patch type be so that it won't > be overlooked?
I _think_ it should be 1.2 compatible, but it needs testing. You should pay particular attention to the comments and check that the assumptions about scheduler behaviour are still valid in 1.2. Mike -- Mike Jagdis Web: http://www.eris-associates.co.uk Eris Associates Limited Tel: +44 7780 608 368 Reading, England Fax: +44 118 926 6974 _______________________________________________ Callweaver-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-dev
