|
seems that callweaver is just a fork with good intentions and no
follow-up... maybe back to asterisk Kind regards, Olivier Szombathelyi György a écrit : I also contacted with David Woodhouse with replacing OpenPBX with CallWeaver some days ago, also sent him a slightly updated spec file (where --as-needed ld flag works, only on FC7, an issue preventing this working on FC6) This is the issue (I don't call it a bug): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162023Btw, can anyone correct the contrib/fedora/callweaver.logrotate, it has an incorrect callweaver.org directory name (should be callweaver only)? Regards, György On Tuesday 05 June 2007 02:46:46 Anthony Messina wrote:I'm currently building fc6.x86_64 RPMs. I'd appreciate if some folks could test them. I am new to package building and RPM creation so I'm hoping that I'll be able to improve the spec file for future use. My main page for my CallWeaver related stuff is at: http://messinet.com/project/callweaver The (smart|yum) repository is located at http://messinet.com/pub/fedora/6/ I also put the spec file and the build logs up there to view. Please report any CallWeaver RPM related issues in my support forum. http://messinet.com/support As I learn more about this building process, I'll try to build for i386 as well. And soon, I'll upgrade to Fedora 7 and build for that. Thanks folks._______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users |
_______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
