Hi there,

Is anyone able to help me with that? I am getting frustrated, because  
there seems to be no fully working option for T.38 and voice, at  
least for my config.

Regards,

Matthias

Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:

> Von: Matthias Gelbhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Datum: 4. Juli 2007 10:16:23 MESZ
> An: Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <callweaver- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [Callweaver-users] No voice on incoming calls -  
> possible bug?
> Antwort an: Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion  
> <[email protected]>
>
> Hi!
>
> Steve gave me the advice to use the T38_DISABLE option.
>
> Do I understand it correctly, that I use the option inside the
> extension.conf like so:
>
> exten => +4925729169xxx,1,Set(T38_DISABLE=1)
> exten => +4925729169xxx,2,Dial(SIP/26)
>
> Unfortunatly, that is not working :(
>
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 27.06.2007 um 16:17 schrieb Steve Underwood:
>
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> The far end is trying to make a T.38 call, and Callweaver
>> negotiates and accepts that. Something isn't right though. The
>> UDPTL packets being sent still seem to be the wrong kind.
>>
>> This looks like a situation where you really should be using the
>> new option to disable T.38 operation, if the other end is broken in
>> some way. When CtRiX gets back from his holiday we will check out
>> the redundancy negotiation again.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> Matthias Gelbhardt wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> I had made that change earlier, but the result is the same. I have
>>> attached another dump.
>>>
>>> You said, there is something broken. Is it the fact, that the two
>>> ends are negotiating to use T.38, as I am calling a phone and no  
>>> fax?
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callweaver-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
>

_______________________________________________
Callweaver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users

Reply via email to