Steve Underwood schrieb: > Hi all, > > Anyone who has been having trouble with spandsp's T.38 gateway and FAX > machines which send TEP might find the latest spandsp snapshot > interesting. I want to do more work in this area of spandsp, but the > changes in today's snapshot certainly seem to avoid most problems I've seen.
Hi Steve and others! Probably this is a little bit off-topic, but some time ago I tried Faxgateway with CW and never succeeded. Recently I tried Faxgateway with Asterisk and it worked. AFAIK both are based on spandsp - thus I wonder will there be any differences between those? I guess of course there are differences in handling the reINVITE to T.38, but once the reINVITE to T.38 was performed - should there be any differences? Further can someone please tell me how udptl is implemented in CW? In asterisk it is a dedicated component, like rtp.c. This has the disadvantage, that Asterisk uses for T.38 different ports than for RTP. Is this also in CW the case? Or does CW reuse the RTP ports for udptl? thanks Klaus _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
