A GOOD SHOW : COST OVER $ 60 millions dollars .
1. international co-prosecutor Andrew Cayley
2. KHMER Rouge tribunal co-prosecutor Chea Leang ( CPP official is a
Vietnamese woman , acting on behalf of the Khmer people in Cambodia occupied by
Vietnam in violation of the 10 UN resolutions )
PROBLEM : PAWN GAME SET BY ZIONIST JEWS OF THE HENRY KISSINGER GROUP .
The 1970s era of detente was a sham. Increased U.S.-Soviet trade, allegedly
designed to lower tensions, was entirely contrary to historical observation and
rational deduction. Mikhail Suslov, longtime Russian Communist Party
theoretician, stated in 1972 that the U.S.-Soviet detente was temporary and
that, so far as the Soviet Union is concerned, merely an interlude to gain
strength for the next stage of the battle against "imperialist aggression."
HENRY KISSINGER WAS INVOLVED IN DETENTE ,US-SOVIET TRADE during 1970's.
About 80 percent of the armaments and supplies for the Vietnamese War came from
the Soviet Union. Yet a key part of President Nixon's policy was the transfer
of technology to the USSR which aids Soviet war potential.
"peaceful trade" is boiled out, it comes down to a single inescapable fact: the
guns, the ammunition, the weapons, the transportation systems that killed
Americans in Korea and Vietnam came from the American-subsidized economy of the
Soviet Union.
The trucks that carried these weapons down the Ho Chi Minh trail came from
American-built plants.
The ships that carried the supplies to Sihanoukville and Haiphong ...came from
NATO allies and used propulsion systems that our State Department could have
kept out of Soviet hands — indeed, the Export Control Act and the Battle Act,
ignored by State, required exactly such action.
What does the U.S. Constitution say about DETENTE , US-SOVIET TRADE AND MIA
, POW IN VIETNAM ?
Here is Article III, Section 3:
United States Constitution
ARTICLE III, SECTION 3
SOLUTION ?
only henry kissinger has the key to peace and Independence of Cambodia.
Henry Kissinger you have to fix it. It's your job.
RESTORE CAMBODIA INDEPENDENCE BEFORE YOU LEAVE THIS EARTH .
PLEASE .
BURY
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Co-prosecutor responds to Cayley
Co-Prosecutors Andrew Cayley and Chea Leang exchange words at the ECCC last
year. ECCC/Pool Wednesday, 11 May 2011
James O’Toole and Cheang Sokha
The Phnom Penh Post
KHMER Rouge tribunal co-prosecutor Chea Leang has responded to a statement from
her international counterpart calling for further investigation in the court’s
controversial third case, reiterating her opposition to the investigation and
claiming that the suspects are out of the tribunal’s jurisdiction.
In a statement on Monday, international co-prosecutor Andrew Cayley said he
believed allegations set forth by the prosecution in a 2009 submission to the
court’s investigating judges “have not been fully investigated”. The statement
followed an announcement from the investigating judges last month that they had
concluded their Case 003 investigation, though they did limited field
investigation and did not even interview the suspects in the case, causing
court observers to charge that the investigation had been deliberately
curtailed in the face of government opposition.
Cayley listed a series of additional investigative steps in his statement that
he said he planned to request that the judges perform, as he is permitted to do
under the rules of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, as the
tribunal is formally known.
Cambodian officials, however, have repeatedly expressed opposition to Case 003
as well as the still-pending Case 004, and yesterday, Chea Leang renewed her
claim that the suspects in Case 003 fall outside the tribunal’s jurisdiction.
“The National Co-Prosecutor maintains that the named suspects in Case File 003
do not fall within the jurisdiction of the ECCC to be brought to trial and that
the Tribunal’s mandate can be adequately fulfilled through the prosecution of
the Accused persons in the ECCC Detention Facility,” Chea Leang said in a
statement. The agreement between the United Nations and the government that
established the tribunal, she added, “envisaged the prosecution of a limited
number of people”.
The identities of the suspects in Case 003 remain officially confidential,
though court documents reveal them as former Khmer Rouge navy commander Meas
Muth and air force commander Sou Met.
International prosecutor William Smith made submissions for Cases 003 and 004
to the investigating judges in 2009 without the support of Chea Leang after a
lengthy dispute over the issue. Cambodian court staff have consistently
expressed opposition to these cases, echoing public remarks by Prime Minister
Hun Sen, who has warned that prosecutions beyond Case 002 could plunge the
Kingdom into civil war.
Prosecutors have said they will not request further investigations beyond Case
004.
In response to Cayley’s statement on Monday, Information Minister Khieu
Kanharith said the government’s stance on the issue remained the same,
repeating a warning about the additional cases to the tribunal’s international
staff.
“If they want to go into Case 003 or 004, they should just pack their bags and
return home,” he said.
Yesterday, however, he sought to walk back his remarks, saying the government
thinks “the court should be allowed to do its work”.
“In general, we should let the court officials do their job,” he said. “The
government is not involved in that.”
The 2003 agreement between the government and the UN establishing the tribunal
empowers it to prosecute “senior leaders” and those “most responsible” for
Khmer Rouge crimes. But John Ciorciari, a senior legal adviser with the
Documentation Centre of Cambodia, said in an email that specific questions
about the ECCC’s jurisdiction were “never adequately resolved in the political
negotiations to create the court”.
“If cases 003 and 004 are dismissed, the decision not to interview suspects
will raise legitimate questions on whether the dismissals were pre-planned,
especially if dismissals are justified by a lack of evidence,” he said.
“If the ECCC does dismiss the cases, it will be important not to appear to
dress up jurisdictional disputes in the guise of insufficient evidence.”
In his statement on Monday, Cayley provided details on a number of crime sites
being investigated as part of Case 003 in an attempt to aid prospective civil
party applicants interested in joining the case. The move apparently came in
response to the fact that the investigating judges had provided no such
details, even after the conclusion of their investigation.
Under court rules, victims have until next Wednesday to submit civil party
applications, though Cayley has asked the judges to extend this deadline by six
weeks.
Civil party lawyer Silke Studzinsky said yesterday that there was “high
interest” in the case among prospective civil parties, but that these people
had unfortunately received no guidance from the court on the issue prior to
Cayley’s statement.
“Very often when I’m in the provinces and talk to victims and civil parties,
they often ask about Case 003 and Case 004,” she said.
From: nokore...@gmail.com
To: cwci_secretar...@yahoo.com; samleng_khmernational...@yahoo.com;
samlengkaunkh...@yahoo.com; sam...@lesjeuneskhmers.com; khmerepub...@yahoo.com;
khmereli...@free.fr; khmer-mchas-s...@googlegroups.com;
khmerkampucheak...@gmail.com; khmer.sralanh.kh...@gmail.com;
khmer.citiz...@gmail.com; khmersu...@gmail.com; khmeryouthn...@yahoo.com;
i...@fpmonline.net; i...@ccc-cambodia.org; i...@csdcambodia.org;
i...@ngoforum.org.kh; ngofo...@ngoforum.org.kh; sil...@forum.org.kh;
p...@cdri.forum.org.kh; ch...@forum.org.kh; c...@online.com.kh;
cycen...@gmail.com; ycc_secretar...@yahoo.com; kya_off...@yahoo.com;
director....@online.com.kh; ckimh...@yahoo.com; fun.secre...@camintel.com;
funcinpecme...@yahoo.com; s.k.k.cabi...@camnet.com.kh; c...@camnet.com.kh;
srpcabi...@gmail.com; lindakkk...@yahoo.com; kkkyoe...@yahoo.com;
kkcpressoff...@yahoo.com; Infos.Info@ks; angkorboreine...@yahoo.com;
angkorm...@gmail.com; socheat...@apiinstitute.org; socheat_...@yahoo.com;
sokleangc...@yahoo.com; socheach...@gmail.com; chey_...@yahoo.com;
chan.sov...@yahoo.com; sa...@online.com.kh; ny...@everyday.com.kh;
puth...@gmail.com; viraky...@yahoo.com; virak...@yahoo.com; t...@clec.org.kh;
ou_chanr...@yahoo.com; kemso...@yahoo.com; sonch...@gmail.com;
soc...@hotmail.com; sukun_k...@yahoo.com; sophak2...@gmail.com;
sambovannar...@yahoo.com; mohari...@yahoo.com; iengsit...@yahoo.com;
nuon_sothi...@hotmail.com; luda...@hotmail.com; chanbor...@yahoo.com;
cnro_soksok...@yahoo.com; s.thom...@gmail.com; theary.s...@gmail.com;
sivnin....@gmail.com; th...@cchrcambodia.org; se...@csdcambodia.org;
sokun...@csdcambodia.org; buntho...@cchrcambodia.org; no...@vodradio.org;
sav...@cchrcambodia.org; darav...@vodradio.org; chak.so...@cchrcambodia.org;
chaksoph...@yahoo.com; ung.chansop...@cambodgesoir.info; penbo...@yahoo.fr;
menghour2...@yahoo.com; savyout...@yahoo.com; hangcha...@yahoo.com;
chea_kim...@yahoo.com; puy...@online.com.kh; t...@camnet.com.kh;
tcn...@online.com.kh; dapn...@gmail.com; redact...@ledevoir.com;
monaksekar-kh...@camnet.com.kh; kampucheath...@camnet.com.kh;
chakra...@camnet.com.kh; informat...@cambodia.gov.kh; press...@gmail.com;
informat...@information.gov.kh; ad...@forum.org.kh; licadhom...@gmail.com;
comf...@online.com.kh
CC: camdisc@googlegroups.com; cabi...@norodomsihanouk.info;
cabi...@norodomsihamoni.org; roy_cab_beij...@yahoo.com; cabine...@camnet.com.kh
Subject: C'est la précision gagnante de M. Soun Sérey Râtha
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:35:08 -0400
A tous nos Compatriotes khmers dans le Monde
Pour appuyer et supporter la bonne cause de précision de M. Soun
Sérey Râtha sur les ondes du kppmradio.org du 08 Mai 2011concernant
la superficie de 4,6 km2 autour de notre Prasath Preah Vihear, j'ai déjà
envoyé une lettre ouverte à Hun Sèn en date du 11 Février 2011 en lui
demandant : Pourqoi le Gouvernement Ayâng Yuon de Phnom Penh
a-t-il l'intention de soumettre le Procès gagnant de la cour internationale de
Justice
de la Haye du 15 Juin 1962 à être retraduit en invitant aussi le Siam à y
assister ?
Pour quelles raisons ? Cette décision de la cour internationale de Justice
de la Haye du 15 Juin 1962 était tellement précise, valable, toujours en
vigueur éternelle. on ne peut pas en aucun cas de reviser de telles façons.
Donc c'était une perte totale pour notre pauvre Cambodge, si cedit procès serait
retraduit pour la deuxième fois devant la cour internationale de Justice de la
Haye.
Veuillez écouter la précision de M.Soun Sérey Râtha sur les ondes de
kppmradio.org
du 08 Mai 2011, et relire ma lettre ouverte adressée à HUN SÈN du 11 Février
2011 ci-jointe.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to camdisc@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
camdisc-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
