---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gaffar Peang-Meth <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:40 AM
Subject: Fwd: CAMBODIA: Stop cursing the darkness
To:



To unsubscribe click this
link<http://internal.ahrchk.net/phplist/?p=unsubscribe&uid=2275fdb1088ed70386eda99339a8ce6d>,
to change preferences click this
link<http://internal.ahrchk.net/phplist/?p=preferences&uid=2275fdb1088ed70386eda99339a8ce6d>

 *FOR PUBLICATION*
AHRC-ETC-005-2014
February 17, 2014

*An article by Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth published by the Asian Human Rights
Commission*

 *CAMBODIA: Stop cursing the darkness*

 *Eleanor Roosevelt (1884--1962) (Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt): "Great minds
discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people." *

 *James Madison (1751--1836) (Federalist Paper #47): "The accumulation of
all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands,
whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or
elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." *

 *Theodore Roosevelt (1858--1919): "Order without liberty and liberty
without order are equally destructive.*

Prime Minister Hun Sen once said, he derived his forte from his opponents'
weaknesses. I couldn't agree more. The opposite is also true: the
opposition may gain strength from Hun Sen's missteps.

 *The gift that keeps on giving*

 Cambodia's unnecessary political impasse has dragged on since the July 28,
2013 election. Despite alleged election irregularities and fraud by the
ruling Cambodian People's Party, the CPP acknowledged half the country
voted for the opposition Cambodian National Rescue Party, nearly doubling
the number of seats--to 55--held by the opposition CNRP in the National
Assembly. The ruling CPP reduced the number of seats it holds from 90 to
68.Had Premier Hun Sen and his CPP associates opted for a (logical) win-win
political compromise through which the CPP would control of the executive
and the CNRP the legislature, Cambodia's best interests would have been
served.

The CNRP says it has been robbed of election victory. It called for an
independent investigation that was rejected by Hun Sen and associates, who
also rejected anything else the opposition proposed, including a delay in
inaugurating the National Assembly. Lines of voters carrying boxes of
petitions to the King urging the delay were ignored. With an upsurge of
popular discontent, the CNRP seized on "people power," challenged CPP rule
and legitimacy. With Cambodians wanting change and in need of leadership,
the CNRP promised that change and offered to lead. They called on Hun Sen
to resign.

Domestic and international rights groups have for years compiled records of
Hun Sen's violations of human rights, suppression of free expression and
justice, among other abuses of power. Greed and misjudgment propounded by
Khmer cultural propensities toward *A'thmaAnh* ("I'ism," self-love,
self-adoration), have led iron fisted ruler Hun Sen to use arrests and raw
power against opponents, thereby alienating more people with whom he should
build bridges. Recently, Hun Sen could have managed to keep garment workers
out of hot politics, but he sent his military to crush them for demanding a
minimum monthly wage of $160, imposed a ban on peaceful assembly,
dismantled Freedom Park. By so doing, he sent garment workers--who toil in
an industry responsible for about 35 percent of the country's GDP--into the
CNRP's waiting arms.

Some Hun Sen antagonists never tire of enumerating his wrongdoings, and
foreign rights groups chronicle Hun Sen's rights abuses. Cambodian Center
for Human Rights president, Ou Virak, described Hun Sen in a recent lecture
at Stanford as a figure whose behavior and speech make people "love to
hate."My objection to Hun Sen's rule is seen in what political theorist
James Madison, fourth President of the United States (1809-1817), described
as "tyranny": anyone holding the powers of the executive, the legislature,
and the judiciary altogether.

Someone recently posted a Khmer text on the Internet that is a trigger to
Cambodians' emotions. "Every member *("sakmachoekteangors")* of the
Cambodian People's Party is barbarian who doesn't recognize his/her own
(Khmer) blood, nor his/her own (Khmer) race..." More productively, CNRP Sam
Rainsy told *The Diplomat:*"You don't have to dismiss every civil servant,
the whole bureaucracy (recruited by and officially affiliated with the CPP)
... We have to keep the same personnel, but the important thing is the
spirit, the orientation."

Returning to *The Diplomat*, Sam Rainsy said, "The pressure from the
grassroots is to remain strong, not to negotiate or bargain for any
position." Does Sam Rainsy stand to lose support if he chooses to
negotiate? Does the CNRP pander to the worst elements of populism by
assenting to the anti-Vietnamese element of nationalism? CNRP vice
president KemSokhatold *The Diplomat, *which described anti-Vietnamese
"nationalist rhetoric ... a strategy of unapologetic populism": "It's the
supporters that want to hear it from the politicians ... Cambodians are very
sensitive about the issue and if any politician doesn't respond to that
frustration you will be framed as unpatriotic or unaware of the truth."

My former students at university would affirm that I have long taught them
to consider how responsible elected leaders must resolve the temptation to
parrot what voters want rather than taking a perhaps less popular but wiser
and more just course of action on the people's behalf.

 *"Talks" or just talk? *

 There is no problem that lacks a solution. Any problem can be solved
through imaginative critical thinking. A predicament requires one to
develop ways to cope with a situation while searching for a better
alternative. Reasoned compromise may leave neither party fully satisfied,
but it is the road to incremental, sustainable change that will move a
productive society forward.

UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Cambodia, Surya Subedi, who
visited Cambodia on Jan 12-17, believes that "change" is "possible" in
Cambodia, "if underpinned by serious and comprehensive reforms of State
institutions as spelt out in detail in four of my reports to the Human
Rights Council."Not only is change "possible," it is also "inevitable to
meet the aspirations of the population in a dynamic world," Subedi told a
press conference.

"Change is coming to Cambodia faster than many had anticipated. *The
challenge forthe current political leadership within both of the main
political parties is to embrace change and to find a way to manage it in
the best interests of the country."* (Italics mine)

"(P)olitical reconciliation was the only way forward for the country,"
Subedi affirmed as he called on leaders of both parties to "overcome their
mistrust and immediately return to the negotiating table without further
delay, possibly in the presence of a third party either to witness or
mediate if deemed helpful."

Of course, CPP and CNRP leaders say they are always ready to negotiate.

Upon his return to Phnom Penh on Feb 10 from a two-week trip abroad, CNRP
leader Sam Rainsy told supporters, "We have a lot of friends in the world";
that he would "lay out a strategy to come out victorious" in the political
deadlock, hence, "Citizens, don't be hopeless."

Yet, earlier in the same day Hun Sen told a university graduation ceremony
he will continue business as usual despite the opposition's boycott of the
National Assembly. "I will not talk about the political situation," he
said, but immediately he fired shot at the CNRP: "We must not allow . . .
any reactionary group to hold the country hostage."

Then came the usual political *Ramvong* circle dance ritual. On Feb 13, the
CPP invited the CNRP to send representatives to discuss measures for
election reforms. *Radio Free Asia *in Khmer broadcast its headline,
"Cambodian Parties Voice Optimism on Breaking Deadlock," and reported Sam
Rainsy's speech in Kompong Speu: "The political deadlock will be resolved
soon in order to allow Cambodia to have national unity." Did this imply
both parties would be working together, mutually recognizing each party's
legitimacy?

The CPP Interior Ministry's Secretary of State welcomed the CNRP's decision
to resume talks, "If they have good intentions."Were their intentions in
doubt? RFA reported Kem Sokha as saying on Feb 12 that the CNRP will
continue to press for an early election. Was this not rejected by the CPP
from the start? *The Phnom Penh Post *reported the CNRP demanded to be part
of an already established committee of 10 senior CPP officials approved by
Hun Sen since Dec 9; that CNRP public affairs chief Mu Sochua rejected
CPP's "exclusivity."Fair enough. Nothing can be long lasting if it is not
inclusive.

However, China's Xinhua News Agency's Feb 15 reported CPP and CNRP
representatives will meet on Feb 18 to discuss the "establishment of a
mechanism for an electoral reform." It quoted CNRP spokesman Yem Ponharith:
"The CNRP will end boycott of parliament if the two sides agree on the
establishment of a mechanism for an electoral reform and an early
election." Xinhua reminded readers that Hun Sen has said he would neither
step down nor agree to a re-vote.

In brief, the CNRP wants a new election; the CPP says, no way. The CPP
insists that the CNRP must occupy its Assembly seats for talks to begin;
the CNRP says it doesn't sit with an illegitimate government. Nearly seven
months have passed. Neither the CPP nor the CNRP has sufficient leverage
over the other to end this stalemate. An ideology of pluralism that would
advance the nation based on the needs of all its members is lacking in
either of the two influential political parties.

 *Pluralism*

Exclusiveness--exclusion--pitches people and groups against one another.
Inclusiveness--inclusion-- gives people and groups a place in a society or a
system. But it is pluralism that represents a model of democracy: Different
groups with different ideas, opinions, and interests interact and share
power and responsibilities. Pluralism is not live and let live. It is a
commitment to differences through an understanding and a tolerance of
others. It means continuous dialogue and interactions, give and take,
compromise, and determination to engage with diversity. Pluralism must be
born from within, and the will for it must come from within. All
signatories of the Paris Peace Accords cannot implant pluralism for
Cambodians.

Lord Gautama Buddha taught 2,500 years ago, "We ourselves must walk the
path."

.................

*The AHRC is not responsible for the views shared in this article, which do
not necessarily reflect its own.*


*About the Author:*

 Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth is retired from the University of Guam, where he
taught political science for 13 years. He currently lives in the United
States. He can be reached at [email protected].


 # # #

*About AHRC:** The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional
non-governmental organisation that monitors human rights in Asia, documents
violations and advocates for justice and institutional reform to ensure the
protection and promotion of these rights. The Hong Kong-based group was
founded in 1984.*

Read this News 
online<http://www.humanrights.asia/opinions/columns/AHRC-ETC-005-2014>



*Visit our new website with more features at www.humanrights.asia
<http://www.humanrights.asia/>. *

*You can make a difference. Please support our work and make a **donation
here. <http://www.humanrights.asia/get-involved/donate> *

-----------------------------

Asian Human Rights Commission

Unit 1 & 2, 12/F.,

Hopeful Factory Centre,

10-16 Wo Shing Street Fotan,

New Territories Hongkong S.A.R.

Tel: +(852) 2698-6339 Fax: +(852) 2698-6367

Web: humanrights.asia

twitter/youtube/facebook: humanrightsasia

*Please consider the environment before printing this email.*


powered by phplist <http://www.phplist.com> v 2.10.17, (c) phpList
ltd<http://www.phplist.com/poweredby>





-- 

*




-- 
"There's only one corner of the universe you can be certain of improving,
and that's your own self."
~ Aldous Huxley

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to