I think the big issues is that for it to be properly AL 2.0 licenced, we need to make sure the contributors have a CLA on file.
For now I think we should apply a security policy to the space that only allows users with registered CLA on file apply changes. Regards, Hiram On 6/15/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/14/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey I just did a little more hacking and if you add this to you maven > command line: > "-P release" > then it will download the camel website and include it in the binary > distros under /doc/website > > Not sure if we should use this for the 1.0 release since I'm not sure > if there would LICENSE issues to worry about by including website > content which is wiki driven. Perhaps we should start including the > AL 2.0 copyright headers on the wiki pages so that contributors know > that any contributions would be under that LICENSE. Thoughts? FWIW all the HTML files already have ASL headers :) -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
