[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43546#action_43546
 ] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-612:
-----------------------------------

Hadrian good comments.

>In other words if there is no explicit otherwise() to go the errorHandler (no 
>redelivery of course).
How can we archive this, the DeadLetterChannel is probably already "chaining" 
the routing?

Would be good to have it documented somehow. I do think the wiki needs a 
section where each DSL types is documented one-by-one. That is a however a 
extensive work to do.

> Exchange should end in error when no choice in a ChoiceType matches
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-612
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-612
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Gert Vanthienen
>            Assignee: Gert Vanthienen
>
> When you define a route with a choice() and no matching when() clause is 
> found, the Exchange just ends successfully without doing anything.  In my 
> mind, it should fail by default in this case (or we should at least have an 
> easy way to get this behavior).
> {code}
> from(DIRECT_ROUTER).choice()
>   .when(xpath("/oc:order_confirmation/oc:order/oc:customer/@category = 
> '140'"))
>     .to(DIRECT_CUSTOMER1)
>   .when(xpath("/oc:order_confirmation/oc:order/oc:customer/@category = 
> '116'"))
>     .to(DIRECT_CUSTOMER2);
> {code}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to