[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=45893#action_45893
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-316:
-----------------------------------
+1 to #3
I suggest to use a header without any minus or dot. We have trouble with these
already. And we consider using a new pattern for Camel 2.0 that James suggested:
"CamelFault" is a better header name.
BTW: We also have a throwFault DSL.
> Merge Fault and Exception semantics
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-316
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-316
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Hadrian Zbarcea
> Assignee: Hadrian Zbarcea
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> The fact that there are output/fault/exception could be confusing and clutter
> the dsl, especially for components where there is no distinction between
> fault and exception. We should merge the two and simplify the model.
> See nabble thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/in-out-fault-messages-discussion-to14170013s22882.html#a14170013
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
