I've never used this, nor could I imagine when I'd ever want to use it.
+1 for removing
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> Now I get it :). In any non trivial case it's useless and could be
> confusing/error prone I agree.
>
> I think it is there mostly for convenience for developers, so if we take it
> out the inconvenience would be that they'd have to specify the endpoint
> (uri) explicitly, which from my point of view is good.
>
> A strong +1 from me on this, but I'd like another opinion too.
>
> Cheers
> Hadrian
>
>
>
> On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:56 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> Hi
>>
>> Yes I did not make my point clear.
>>
>> It's the fact that CamelContext requires a default endpoint URI to be
>> configured. Then you can use ProducerTemplate.sendBody("Hello World")
>> and then it will send this body the default endpoint URI. Normally you
>> have to provide the URI as well such as:
>> ProducerTemplate.sendBody("direct:in", Hello World");
>>
>> The class DefaultEndpoint should of course be there as the base class ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> /Claus
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Claus,
>>>
>>> DefaultEndpoint is the base class for all Endpoints and provides a
>>> default
>>> implementation of the Endpoint methods.
>>>
>>> Am I misunderstanding your question?
>>>
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>> On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I am wondering if this "default" endpoint is used by anyone? I am
>>>> wondering what the purpose really is and what it solves. Is it
>>>> possible to consider to remove this?
>>>> Would remove many methods for ProducerTemplate so less for end users
>>>> to get confused by.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> /Claus Ibsen
>>>> Apache Camel Committer
>>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> /Claus Ibsen
>> Apache Camel Committer
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Jon
http://janstey.blogspot.com/
