On 12/02/2008, Hadrian Zbarcea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about camel-cxf as the component name.  Yeah, the cxf: prefix
> (not cxf:// :) ) would work and I would use it as simple and intuitive.

Not a bad idea.

I still would prefer we search for the scheme first, then try
camel-${scheme} second to avoid breaking things when folks are using a
configured JMS / ActiveMQ component.

-- 
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com

Reply via email to