Hi Charles I have not tested my self. Going to lunch now.
However I do think you can do as #1 but without implementing the interface. Just add the Exchange Exchange as the parameter anyway. If not then I do think Camel should be able to do it anyway. The annotations are used to distinguish your parameters and to let Camel know where it should inject the payload etc using the @Body annotation. A parameter of type org.apache.came.Exchange does not need to be decorated with an Annotation as Camel should be able to pick up on this and just pass the exchange directly as it's a 100% type match. But you are welcome to drill down a small sample on this I can use as baseline for a unit test. And if something is missing we can improve camel in this regard. Med venlig hilsen Claus Ibsen ...................................... Silverbullet Skovsgårdsvænget 21 8362 Hørning Tlf. +45 2962 7576 Web: www.silverbullet.dk -----Original Message----- From: cmoulliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10. juli 2008 12:27 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Annotation @Exchange planned in a future release ? Claus, The way that we implement the class is not the same when you compare both approaches 1) Without annotation The bean implements the interface Processor and retrieves the Exchange object through the method : process(Exchange ex) 2) Using annotation the bean does not implement the processor so it is not possible to retrieve the Exchange except if we inject it through additional annotation Regards Charles Claus Ibsen wrote: > > Hi > > I think you can do like this > > public Exchange doSomething(Exchange exchange) { > ... > return exchange; > } > > So the @Exchange annotation is not really neeed IMHO. As its not a common > class such as java.lang.String etc. > > And I also think you can do return a String etc. instead of Exchange for > just the playload in the message. But I am not 100% sure. > > > Med venlig hilsen > > Claus Ibsen > ...................................... > Silverbullet > Skovsgårdsvænget 21 > 8362 Hørning > Tlf. +45 2962 7576 > Web: www.silverbullet.dk > > -----Original Message----- > From: cmoulliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10. juli 2008 11:34 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Annotation @Exchange planned in a future release ? > > > Hi, > > Is it planned in a future release of Camel to also have the annotation > @Exchange available inside the bean component ? > > I ask you that question because when you want inside a bean to perform by > example a in.getOut().setHeader("", ""), you need to have access to the > Exchange object. The annotation allow to receive the @Properties, @Headers > and @Body but no the exchange. > > Regards, > > Charles > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Annotation-%40Exchange-planned-in-a-future-release---tp18379161s22882p18379161.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Annotation-%40Exchange-planned-in-a-future-release---tp18379161s22882p18379983.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
