Piotr,

My guess was that the Camel component's thread pool was running out of threads. If it is, it wouldn't be showing in any of the components' stacktraces -- they would just be polling the DeliveryChannel for work like the ones you posted. Does your to("jbi:...") ever end up in another Camel routes (e.g. in one that starts with from("jbi:..." )-- if not, we can forget about the thread pool as a cause for your problems alltogether...

You should be able to set the transaction timeout through the JMS endpoint as document on http://activemq.apache.org/camel/jms.html

Regards,

Gert

Piotr Jagielski wrote:
Gert,

In this case only camel jms listener thread hangs, other servicemix
components threads are just waiting like:

"pool-component.servicemix-http-thread-1" prio=1 tid=0x00002aaab8193500
nid=0x4d97 waiting on condition [0x0000000047611000..0x0000000047611c40]
        at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
        at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:146)
        at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1803)
        at
java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue.poll(ArrayBlockingQueue.java:286)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.accept(DeliveryChannelImpl.java:270)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.pollDeliveryChannel(AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:314)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle$1.run(AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:300)
        at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650)
        at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

There is one pool-component-servicemix-http thread with stack like:

"pool-component.servicemix-http-thread-1" prio=1 tid=0x00002aaab8193500
nid=0x4d97 waiting on condition [0x0000000047611000..0x0000000047611c40]
        at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
        at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:146)
        at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1803)
        at
java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue.poll(ArrayBlockingQueue.java:286)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.accept(DeliveryChannelImpl.java:270)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle.pollDeliveryChannel(AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:314)
        at
org.apache.servicemix.common.AsyncBaseLifeCycle$1.run(AsyncBaseLifeCycle.java:300)
        at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650)
        at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)

Is it possible to recover from this by setting some timeout on jms
transaction manager?
My route definition is:
from("activemq:queueA").policy(required)
 .to("jbi:endpoint:B")

Regards,
Piotr


Gert Vanthienen wrote:
Piotr,

I'm guessing that at some point, the message you sent to the jbi endpoint ends up in another Camel route. ServiceMix has a thread pool per component, so in order to process the exchange in the second Camel route, it needs another thread from the pool, where all threads are already waiting on sendSync. We should probably improve the servicemix-camel component to use send() instead of sendSync() whenever possible. For now, you should try to increase the size of the thread pools by modifying conf/servicemix.properties (for a global increase of thread pool size) or by looking at http://servicemix.apache.org/thread-pools.html for a more targeted tuning.

Regards,

Gert

Piotr Jagielski wrote:
Hi,

I have some servicemix-camel service unit which uses following route:
jms queue -> jbi endpoint

After launching some long-running tests, following error occured :

Exception in thread "ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:41368" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 28515
---at
org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.getFromUnmarshallCache(OpenWireFormat.java:513)
---at
org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightUnmarsalCachedObject(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:137)
---at
org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.ConnectionInfoMarshaller.tightUnmarshal(ConnectionInfoMarshaller.java:69)
---at
org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.doUnmarshal(OpenWireFormat.java:347)
---at
org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.unmarshal(OpenWireFormat.java:273)
---at
org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.readCommand(TcpTransport.java:156)
---at
org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:136)
---at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
This exception is not itself a problem, but when i looked at thread dump, it appeared that ToJbiProcessor hung on DeliveryChannel.sendSync :

"DefaultMessageListenerContainer-1776" prio=1 tid=0x00002aaaaea39ee0 nid=0x4547 in Object.wait() [0x00000000539d3000..0x00000000539d4e40]
       at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0x00002afd9884a428> (a org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.InOutImpl) at org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.waitForExchange(DeliveryChannelImpl.java:699) at org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.sendSync(DeliveryChannelImpl.java:472) - locked <0x00002afd9884a428> (a org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.InOutImpl) at org.apache.servicemix.jbi.messaging.DeliveryChannelImpl.sendSync(DeliveryChannelImpl.java:442) at org.apache.servicemix.camel.ToJbiProcessor.process(ToJbiProcessor.java:76) at org.apache.servicemix.camel.JbiEndpoint$1.process(JbiEndpoint.java:46)
       at org.apache.camel.util.ProducerCache.send(ProducerCache.java:67)
       at org.apache.camel.CamelTemplate.send(CamelTemplate.java:107)
       at org.apache.camel.CamelTemplate.send(CamelTemplate.java:57)

Is it possible to set some timeout while calling DeliveryChannel.sendSync? Or shall I set timeout on jms transaction manager to rollback whole transaction? (How to do this?)
Should I post this on servicemix-user too?

Regards,
Piotr


-----
---
Gert Vanthienen
http://www.anova.be



Reply via email to