Hi Horia

You are not the only one that had this problem when upgrading. We have seen 
quite a few users having mixed .jars in the classpath. 

Well glad you found a solution, camel based or not. The important issue is that 
it works and that you are able to understand and maintain the stuff.

And it was even working with WebSphereMQ that can be a bit tricky to get 
working out of the box with popular open-soruce frameworks.

Please keep us posted of your situation. I am personally interested as 
WebSphereMQ is also a broker my client uses from time to time.



Med venlig hilsen
 
Claus Ibsen
......................................
Silverbullet
Skovsgårdsvænget 21
8362 Hørning
Tlf. +45 2962 7576
Web: www.silverbullet.dk

-----Original Message-----
From: seven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 7. august 2008 11:27
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: DefaultMessageListenerContainer threading issue - possible false 
alert


Hi,

I just found out that due to the mode I started my app in my class path were
both camel jars ( old ones and camel-1.4.0 ) and my application loaded at
runtime the old jars.

So it's possible that camel-1.4 does not have this problem anymore but
unfortunately we ditched the camel jms component and turned to direct spring
message listeners so when I have some time I will revert the configration
and let you know if the problem is still there.

Regards,
Horia


Claus Ibsen wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I recall there was a issue like this 1-2 months ago. Try searching the
> user and dev forums. 
> 
> Can you try with activeMQ instead of WebSphereMQ to see if it has the same
> issue? We would like to narrow it down what is the problem. 
> 
> 
> Med venlig hilsen
>  
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> 8362 Hørning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/DefaultMessageListenerContainer-threading-issue-tp18811410s22882p18866902.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to