Hi,
I think the "consumer.recursive" parameter which can be passed to a polling
FileEndpoint is misleading. The way I read it (and perhaps others) is that
subdirectories of the passed directory are not scanned for files. Instead,
recursive=false will prevent any directory scanning at all:
(Camel 1.4.0)
in FileConsumer, line 57:
int rc = pollFileOrDirectory(endpoint.getFile(), isRecursive());
in FileConsumer, line 75:
protected int pollFileOrDirectory(File fileOrDirectory, boolean processDir)
{
if (!fileOrDirectory.isDirectory()) {
return pollFile(fileOrDirectory); // process the file
} else if (processDir) {
...
} else {
LOG.debug("Skipping directory " + fileOrDirectory); // <!-- when
uri is directory and recursive=false
return 0;
}
I think a "recursive" parameter meaning whether to scan subdirectories is
useful. Perhaps some renaming is in order.
Cheers,
--Bill
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FileEndpoing-%22consumer.recursive%22-is-misleading-tp18897261s22882p18897261.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
