Hi As Christian said there is no tight binding from Camel to the JMS provider. It is actually Spring JMS doing the work behind the scenes. So it's nicely abstracted.
At my current client we have integrated with WebSphereMQ using spring JMS and thus also possible with Camel. Med venlig hilsen Claus Ibsen ...................................... Silverbullet Skovsgårdsvænget 21 8362 Hørning Tlf. +45 2962 7576 Web: www.silverbullet.dk -----Original Message----- From: Christian Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13. september 2008 11:09 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Camel and ActiveMQ nitingupta183 schrieb: > Hi All, > > I have recently started work on the Camel and I am really excited to see it > in action. I would like to know that will it be possible to make it work > with JMS providers other than ActiveMQ i.e. MQ Series, JBOSS MQ? Well I > don't see any immidiate need of switching ActiveMQ, but just want to stay > clear of any library lock-in. > > Regards, > Nitin > That depends on what you mean by make it work. You can use any JMS provider when using the JMS Component. For most problems that is all you need. In this case camel is a separate component that runs either standalone or embedded into your app. The only use case that is limited to ActiveMQ is running Camel inside the JMS Server. Greetings Christian -- Christian Schneider --- http://www.liquid-reality.de
