2008/9/16 raulvk.soa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nevermind. Sorry I got confused. Obviously you can make different log > categories use the same Appender! > > That would be a temporary solution, as architecturally speaking we would be > overloading the log4j with an awful amount of loggers, which I am not happy > doing. > > Do you think it is feasible to achieve this by extending the Logger class > and using it as a processor? What method would I have to override? Any > special considerations? I think I may attempt to do this...
I'm not quite sure I follow. Claus's example uses a single Logger called "ValidatingAgainstXMLSchema" or whatever. i.e. you can use a single Logger if you want - the URI log:foo defines the logger to use. There's not one per message or anything like that. Each different log URI uses a different logger, so its up to you to define how many different logger/categories you want to use. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://open.iona.com
