You can get the 2 different SM engines connected by using the SM's components not the camel components.
Willem Mick Knutson wrote: > If you have 2 different SM engines, you could have camelAppA running on 1, > then camelAppB running on another one. Could you not at that point route > from camelAppA to camelAppB? > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Willem Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Please see my comments in the mail. >> >> Drone42 wrote: >>> Have I understood it correctly; >>> >>> - A CamelContext runs as one application. >> Yes >>> - A given instance is thus local. >> Yes >>> - If I want a route in a distributed network, then I can use for example >>> ServiceMix to integrate Camel instances into a system managing the >> complete >>> flow >> You could use camel-activmq, camel-cxf even camel-file components to >> build up the distributed network endpoint and using the camel DLS to >> build the route rule. >> AFAIK ServiceMix's components are stay in the same JVM. >> >> Willem >> >> >> > >
