I am using the full camel jar (apache-camel-1.5.0.jar), so i suppose that i would not need to add any more Jars.
Also, there is not exception thrown, the execution ends properly. Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: > > Hi > > And you have camel-ognl on the classpath? > > > /Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:43 PM, packo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Thank you for your swift reply. >> >> I have already tried ognl, following the example in the URL you >> mentioned. >> >> The route i created looked like: >> >> <route> >> <from uri="direct:foobar" /> >> <choice> >> <when> >> <ognl>request.headers.foo = 'foo1'</ognl> >> <bean ref="fooBean1" /> >> </when> >> <when> >> <ognl>request.headers.foo = 'foo2'</ognl> >> <bean ref="fooBean2" /> >> </when> >> </choice> >> . >> . >> . >> </route> >> >> >> But still the result was that i was always getting true for the result of >> ognl expression. Maybe i am overlooking sth with OGNL? >> >> >> Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> Yeah simple does not understand EQ, GE, LT and other operators. >>> >>> You can use some of the other languages >>> - ognl >>> - el >>> - groovy >>> - bean (for using POJO) >>> - xpath if your payload is xml based >>> >>> See >>> http://activemq.apache.org/camel/scripting-languages.html >>> http://activemq.apache.org/camel/ognl.html >>> >>> Using OGNL it would be >>> <ognl>request.headers.foo = 'foo1'</ognl> >>> >>> But I am wondering if we should improve the simple language so it can >>> be use some simple operators for simple test such as in your use-case. >>> No need to learn OGNL, Groovy or depend on 3rd part .jars. Just plain >>> Java. >>> >>> James, any thoughts on this? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> /Claus Ibsen >>> Apache Camel Committer >>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, packo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It might be a simple question, but i am stuck with it in the past few >>>> days so >>>> any help would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> I have a route that looks like this: >>>> >>>> <route> >>>> <from uri="direct:foobar" /> >>>> <choice> >>>> <when> >>>> <simple>${in.headers.foo} == 'foo1'</simple> >>>> <bean ref="fooBean1" /> >>>> </when> >>>> <when> >>>> <simple>${in.headers.foo} == 'foo2'</simple> >>>> <bean ref="fooBean2" /> >>>> </when> >>>> </choice> >>>> <choice> >>>> <when> >>>> <simple>${in.headers.bar } == 'bar1'</simple> >>>> <to uri="bean:barBean?method=barMethod" /> >>>> </when> >>>> </choice> >>>> </route> >>>> >>>> foo and bar headers are pre-populated from the Producer i am using. >>>> What happens is that each expression is evaluated to true. A look in >>>> the >>>> code showed that <simple> evaluates just the existence of a header. >>>> I also tried ognl, xpath and others but nothing seems to work. >>>> >>>> My exchange is a default exchange with a DTO as payload. Am i missing >>>> something??? >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/Endpoint-decision-based-on-Header-Value-with-XML-configuration-tp20811772s22882p20811772.html >>>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Endpoint-decision-based-on-Header-Value-with-XML-configuration-tp20811772s22882p20812287.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Endpoint-decision-based-on-Header-Value-with-XML-configuration-tp20811772s22882p20812462.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
