Claus, I applied changeset 722808 to my copy of 1.5.0 and it does appear to use considerably less memory after one hour of operation.
Thanks, -cnh Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: > > Chris > > I have committed a quick fix for this in the 1.5.1-SNAPSHOT. > http://activemq.apache.org/camel/download.html > > Do you mind testing it? Note that in Camel 2.0 we have refactored the > file consumer so it should not consume all this memory. > > > > /Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Many thanks for pointing this out. I created >> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1138. >> >> Hadrian >> >> On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Christopher Hammack wrote: >> >>> >>> Using a memory profiler, we've identified what appears to be a >>> substantial >>> memory leak in FileConsumer in Camel 1.5.0. It appears that the noopMap >>> is >>> constantly having items added to it, but nothing performs a remove on it >>> when the file is consumed. This causes a very large amount of string >>> data >>> to be accumulated in the heap. In our application, this was a leak of >>> several hundred megabytes and is a showstopper. Considering the >>> apparent >>> severity of this issue, it would really be nice if a fix could be >>> incorporated into a 1.5.1 version. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Memory-leak-in-FileConsumer-in-Camel-1.5.0-tp20794405s22882p20794405.html >>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Memory-leak-in-FileConsumer-in-Camel-1.5.0-tp20794405s22882p20814803.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
