On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:14:57PM +0100, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 13.12.2011, 21:22 +0100 schrieb oliver: > > Hello, > > > > > > I again want to mention R. > > > > The installation procdure for users is very easy. > > What I also like there, is that the documentation > > includes references to books, which explain the algorithms > > or other background information. > > Maybe thats too much of what is needed for OCaml. > > > > But it's what I do like there. > > > > Also R-packages necessarily need to be documented, > > have a manpage / package description. > > > > Not sure if this is necessary with OCaml stuff, > > because *.mli files are there, and ocamlc -i could > > print the interfaces of the modules, if nothing else is there > > to rely on. > > But maybe these kinds of minimalistic documentation-generation > > could be created automatically by the installing tools. > > > > Nicely printed html-docs for interfaces are very helpful. > > > > And also nice would be, to have such nicely printed documentation > > also available at the server, even before downloading any packages. > > So, browsing a package documentation online could be done > > before downloading the package. > > docs.camlcity.org [...]
Yes, I see. There are these nice htmlized-docs. But I meant that this kind of docs also should also be on a CPAN-like server for OCaml. So every package that is available there should also be documented in this way. Ciao, Oliver -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
