On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 20:55, bob zhang <bobzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to separate the syntax extension from the code > generation part? syntax extension is always fragile, code generation > API is still pretty useful. In my opinion, the main meat lies in code > generation part. > Not sure, but even if, I guess it would not be easy. > <:sexp< type t = bla bla >> maybe more robust, but it requires > camlp4of as the basic preprocessor instead of camlp4o If there were only one preprocessor (sexplib) this would work, but having more than one (e.g. also bin-prot) does not seem straightforward. It's not clear how multiple and independently developed code generators can be composed, especially safely without interfering with each other. Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mo...@gmail.com -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
