On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 07:05:25PM +0100, fo...@x9c.fr wrote: > Well, no real obstacle as OCaml-Java showed. > However, OCaml-Java 1.x is still a bare proof of concept due to both > poor design choices and JVM limitations. But then came Java 1.7 and > some limitations were removed (e. g. a garbage collector better suited > to functional languages, and an implementation of method handles). > OCaml-Java has been largely rewritten and now exhibit acceptable > performances.
I tried out ocamljava (1.x) and really liked it. One thing that stopped me from using it was the fact that it 'emulates' a 32 bit OCaml environment, so we get all sorts of limits on strings and arrays. Will the new version 'emulate' 64 bit instead? Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
