I think this would be useful. However, you can already do it in a slightly more complex fashion.
>From the top of my mind, with let ( /* ) f g = f g let ( */ ) f g x = g f x you can achieve 1 /* mem */ [1;2;3] with the added bonus that a C programmer will never be able to read your code :) Cheers, David On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:53 +0200, Till Crueger wrote: > I am posting this in this thread, because this would allow us to write the > above more elegantly as: > 1 `mem` [1;2;3], which is close to what was originally proposed. > > What do you think of this? > > bye, > Till > > -- David Teller Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations. _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
