On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:41:49PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > let ( /\ ) (a1, a2) (b1, b2) = a2 > b1 || b2 > a1
I've just reread the Lexical conventions section in the manual. For some reason when I read it first I thought it said that '\' was allowed, but in fact it's not so this appears to be a bug in camlp4. BUT can we permit this? It's nice to be able to define /\ and \/ operators with the obvious meanings :-) In fact can we open the discussion about converting OCaml source files into UTF-8 and allow _lots_ more symbols? eg: let (∪) = ... let (⊆) = ... Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
