> And Darcs the distributed revision control system. Erik, Darcs is so slow, buggy and broken by design (I speak for direct experience) that even the GHC team decided to switch to GIT or Mercurial, see [1] and [2].
Consider this: three years ago I decided to study a functional language and I had to decide between OCaml and Haskell. In that period, for other reasons, I was searching for a new SCM to replace CVS and I extensively tested Darcs. Darcs was so broken that I decided for OCaml when I realized it was written in Haskell. So Darcs, IMHO, is definitively not "anything significant". [1] http://www.reddit.com/comments/6v2nl/ghc_project_switches_to_git/ [2] https://lopsa.org/node/1656 -- Ing. Paolo Donadeo Studio Associato 4Sigma Website: http://www.4sigma.it Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ ~ :wq _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
