On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:32:07 +0100 Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2008 07:29:21 you wrote: > > So I already use Chamo for my daily work (development, edition of text > > files). What's missing now is access to more information like location of > > definitions, completion and so on. I'm waiting for the result of > > ocamlwizard[3] to see how to use these tools in Chamo to provide these > > missing features. > > Intellisense-style completion would be incredibly productive, particularly in > the context of GUI programming but note that doing this for LablGTK2 would > require the system to have used type inference and type annotations on the > structurally-typed objects in the source code to determine the type of the > start of an expression in order to propose completions for it. Indeed. By the way, I'm not a big fan of completion, I prefer to use/train my memory :-) Maxence -- Maxence Guesdon http://yquem.inria.fr/~guesdon/ Service Expérimentation et Développements https://devel.inria.fr/rocq/ INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt http://www.inria.fr/rocquencourt/ _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
