"David Allsopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought that the point of private types was that you could > deconstruct them... so values of type M.t are valid wherever an int > is used but not the converse.
It should probably be ok for immutable data but not for mutable ones. One example is using String.set on a private string. Jérémie _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
