On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Dario Teixeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It compiles fine. Now uncomment the "(* with sexp *)" parts, such that it > makes use of the Sexplib syntax extension. The compilation fails on the > definition of body_sectional_order_t, with an error "type_is_recursive: > unknown type construct". Is this a known limitation in Type-conv/Sexplib?
This should be fixed in newer releases of type-conv. > One last note to the authors of Sexplib: for each reporting of an issue with > Sexplib there are tons of unreported happy cases. It is such a great tool > that I find myself using it everywhere, hence the inevitability of every > now and then running into problems... Thanks for the feedback! Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
