Julien SIGNOLES wrote: > Hello, > > Is it a bug or a well-known feature that the above program does not emit > a warning (because "f x" should have type unit in the body of "g") ? > > ===== > let f x = x > let g x = f x; 1 > (* let _ = g 2 *) > ====
The compiler could have a command-line switch that enforces the unit type in sequences, i.e. it would add type annotations for you: let f x = x let g x = (f x : unit); 1 There's a camlp4/camlp5 syntax extension that does this (but I don't use it). Martin -- http://mjambon.com/ _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
