On Mar 5, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
Why not using the LLVM OCaml binding? It is directly shipped with
LLVM.
So you can write the entire generator in OCaml...
I would love to use LLVM. My concern is the overhead of calling from
LLVM into OCaml, though. The code I'll be generating will need to make
use of a library of functions.
I'd prefer to stay in OCaml so this library will need to be wrapped in
C, if my understanding is correct. This implies manual labor to code
the wrappers and the runtime overhead to invoke them.
Thanks, Joel
---
http://tinyco.de
Mac, C++, OCaml
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
