-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, camlp4 seems to break parsing of object duplication on 3.11.  Can anyone 
replicate this problem?  Is this an known issue?  A quick google search did 
not reveal anything..

Peng


          Objective Caml version 3.11.0

  # #use "topfind";;
  Findlib has been successfully loaded. Additional directives:
    #require "package";;      to load a package
    #list;;                   to list the available packages
    #camlp4o;;                to load camlp4 (standard syntax)
    #camlp4r;;                to load camlp4 (revised syntax)
    #predicates "p,q,...";;   to set these predicates
    Topfind.reset();;         to force that packages will be reloaded
    #thread;;                 to enable threads

  # #camlp4o;;
  /home/peng/app-data/godi-3.11/lib/ocaml/std-lib/dynlink.cma: loaded
  /home/peng/app-data/godi-3.11/lib/ocaml/std-lib/camlp4: added to search path
  /home/peng/app-data/godi-3.11/lib/ocaml/std-lib/camlp4/camlp4o.cma: loaded
          Camlp4 Parsing version 3.11.0

  # class functional_point x y = object 
      val x = x
      val y = y
      method get_x = x
      method get_y = y
      method move dx dy = {< x = x + dx; y = y + dy >}
    end;;
            Characters 138-144:
      method move dx dy = {< x = x + dx; y = y + dy >}
                                 ^^^^^^
  Warning S: this expression should have type unit.
  Characters 146-156:
      method move dx dy = {< x = x + dx; y = y + dy >}
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^
  Error: This expression has type bool but is here used with type int
  # 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJyoxPfIRcEFL/JewRAg8TAKCjoxTmDmfLxVHa7sXq0tGlt2rKDgCgp/C2
nc4vnKWkTvKXeR4Q0z4XB94=
=IwA+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

Reply via email to