Hans Ole Rafaelsen a écrit : > By removing some of the packages from the link stage, it builds easily > with more BarXXX modules included. Some of the packages seems to high a > higher impact than others. By instead opening BXXX modules, which do the > same as BarXXX modules, but have shorter names, I'm able to include a > few more, when linking against the same packages. Including up to B116 > works, and it fails when trying B117. So it looks like it is impacted of > both the number of symbols and their length. By not linking against any > packages, I'm able to include a large number of my own modules (tested > with long names), so it does not seem to be the length of the command > line arguments that is causing the problems. > > Some info about the various versions of programs being used:
Can you check the version of flexlink you are using? I had some problem when the command line was too long. I'm not sure what the error message where, though. Hoping this helps Salutations Matt _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
