Le mardi 24 août 2010 17:35:15, Romain Beauxis a écrit : > Le mardi 24 août 2010 10:22:48, Anil Madhavapeddy a écrit : > > That's not quite right; "noalloc" calls do not have the OCaml runtime in > > a functioning state at all since the instructions to set it up are not > > emitted by ocamlopt. > > > > See [1] for Xavier Leroy's explanation on the matter, which I've quoted > > below: > > That's right. Therefore, calling caml_copy_string in noalloc mode is > probably not a good idea..
but no-one told to do so there was a boxed value provided to the noalloc function, but this function does not call caml_copy_string at all -- Regards Florent _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
