Le mercredi 25 août 2010 11:26:05, Maxence Guesdon a écrit : > Hello, > > For those who don't know, I'm the maintainer of the Caml Hump. > > For this reason, I have a look at every project announced on the caml-list > and it seems to me that there are more and more projects providing only > links to tarballs or git repositories. > > I think these projects would take advantage of having at least one web page > giving all basic information: description, status, license, author(d), > download links. > > Indeed, having to look for this information in a tarball of a git repos > (with gitweb) is not very convenient. Even the project page on a forge is > not the best way to get the information quickly. It's more a view for a > developer/contributor, not for a potential user. > > Even if this main web page should point to the developer ressources > (repository, forge project, ...), the main access to the project should > be a web page with hand-written text, even a simple one. > > Regards,
I would say that when packagers write patches that add new features it would be nice if they set up such a basic web-page too. -- Regards Florent _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
