On 2010-08-25, at 06:00, Paul Steckler wrote:
> Today, I found the culprit. Here's the pattern:
>
> dynamically load .cmxs file
> query list mutated by .cmxs file (* no problem *)
> Gc.set { (Gc.get()) with Gc.minor_heap_size = ...};
> Gc.set { (Gc.get()) with Gc.major_heap_increment = ... };
> query mutated list (* segfault! *)
>
> If I move the Gc.set's to the program initialization code, before the
> loading of dynamic code, no segfaults occur.
I bet the second Gc.set doesn't matter, and if you replace them with
Gc.minor () you get the same behaviour.
> Is this expected behavior?
Definitely not. You should file a bug report here, preferably with
a complete repro case:
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
-- Damien
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
