bluestorm <bluestorm.d...@gmail.com> writes: > It was actually the case in Caml Light : each datatype constructor > implicitly declared a constructor function with the same name. I > don't exactly know why this feature was dropped in Objective Caml, > but I think I remember (from a previous discussion) that people > weren't sure it was worth the additional complexity.
Would that be not possible now with Camlp4 extension? Wojciech _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
