Ron Jeffries wrote:
> To what extent do local actions such as removal of
> duplication and good naming produce globally good design?
A problem we currently have with a part of our system is that (due to
missed opportunities for refactoring earlier in the project, and
probably a missing metaphor) there seems to be some kind of rather
*global* "conceptual" duplication. I'm not sure wether there is a way to
improve substantially in that situation by local refactorings. With
other words, the design space feels too flat to have an idea of the
direction to best refactor towards...
Any ideas?
Cheers, Ilja
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
