On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:22:35PM -0400, Ron Jeffries wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, at 12:30:55 PM, Michael Feathers wrote:
> > Russell Gold wrote:
>
> >>So should we really be speaking of Assertion-Driven Development rather
> >>than Test-Driven Development? It would certainly eliminate the need to
> >>warn that it is not about testing.
>
> > Very interesting idea. "Assertion" is linked to testing, but doesn't
> > have the connotations that "test" or something like "specification
> > driven development" would.
>
> Yes, that is an interesting idea. Let's try it on for a while.
Could someone help me out by clarifying for me what the
difference would be between Assertion-Driven Development
(ADD) and Design-by-Contract (DBC)? (and how, if at all,
do you feel DBC is different from TDD)
--
Brad Appleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.bradapp.net
Software CM Patterns (www.scmpatterns.com)
Effective Teamwork, Practical Integration
"And miles to go before I sleep." -- Robert Frost
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
