Hmm yes the direct FastCGI support could be supplanted by making sure we have a solid and tested Rack adapter. That way they still get the FastCGI support but we don't have to maintain all the evil parts of it.
I'll look through the list and see what I can do. Hopefully I'll have some time to spend fixing some tickets this week. :) --Jeremy On Jan 12, 2008 6:15 PM, Jonas Pfenniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/1/10, Jeremy McAnally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'm not sure who Camping's steward is at this point(zimbatm? _why?), > > but I haven't seen much activity in quite some time. I really like > > Camping, and I understand open source projects can fall by the > > wayside. > > Some times ago, I proposed to take the project a little further. Times > passes so fast ! I managed to do some cleanup but then got stuck for > some reasons. At last, you are welcome to kick in :) > > Why not start by fixing some open ticket ? I was thinking of dropping > the fastcgi support but if you wish to make it work it would be a > great start. Another part that could be fixed, is the Session support. > Dig in the list archive for some discussions around it. > > Have fun, > zimbatm > > _______________________________________________ > Camping-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list > -- http://www.jeremymcanally.com/ My books: Ruby in Practice http://www.manning.com/mcanally/ My free Ruby e-book http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/ My blogs: http://www.mrneighborly.com/ http://www.rubyinpractice.com/ _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
